Fragmented training doesn’t work. Here’s how we fix it.
- Chris Gamble
- Jul 4
- 2 min read
Leadership development often starts with the right intent.
But somewhere between ambition and action, it gets diluted.
One-off sessions. Generic content. Loose links to strategy.
The real issue?
Fragmentation.
Training that’s disconnected from the realities of work rarely shifts behaviour.
It leaves leaders with insight but no rhythm. Confidence but no momentum.
We call it the learning cliff edge. That drop between learning and doing.
The consequences?
– Leaders who know what good looks like, but can’t practise it under pressure
– Cultural change that sparks, then fades
– Talent development that flatlines after the programme ends
At Polaris, we’ve built our approach to solve this.
We don’t run events. We build journeys.
Our programmes are designed to transfer into performance.
We start by understanding what’s really going on: the friction points, habits, blockers.
Then we build learning that mirrors the real world.
It’s contextual, cohort-based, and deliberately paced.
Always anchored in our Input → Practice → Embed cycle.
And it doesn’t stop at delivery. We engineer rhythm and accountability through follow-up, reflection calls and peer learning.
This is what closes the knowing–doing gap.
We’re pushing even further.
To bridge the learning cliff edge, we’ve refined how we work with senior leaders:
Contract the context, not just the content.
Programme starts with alignment around purpose, outcomes and organisational tension.
Design for pressure points.
We focus learning on the real environments where leadership is tested: ambiguity, stretch, conflict.
Make learning social and visible.
Leadership Circles, reflection forums, feedback loops: learning that builds accountability, not just awareness.
Create narrative, not just modules.
We design journeys that build capability over time: identity, tools, action, reflection, review.
This is what sustainable development looks like.
It’s not an event. It’s a story people grow through.
If your leadership training feels fragmented or flat, it might not be the content or the people.
It might be the system.
Let’s change that.
Comments